planet x nibiru

Image : http://www.flickr.com

I have just watched a TV program NOVA. It declares that may have touched a comet implementation microbial dust by our planet 3.5 billion years maybe. Then it is deposited just enough primitive bacteria to the process of life, which launched eventually developed into a unicellular animals such as amoeba. The rest was just incredibly lucky, environmental conditions and Darwin's theory to life has become. Along the way, are the dinosaurs of the Earth175 million years ago were wiped out for years apparently by a meteor, crashed into us about 65 million. This event destroyed most of the animals of their time together and forced to rethink the nature of "the great lizards and begin the age of mammals.

If this scenario past seems a bit far-fetched, complaints to the various scientists in the fields of biology, paleontology, microbiology, chemistry and concocted that these theories. The search for a plausible explanation for life onEarth has used many brilliant theorists of the millennium. Of course the secular theologians would cast aside most of the scientific answers in favor of a solution with more pious God's mighty hand, the garden of Eden, and Adam and Eve. Naturally this is not always explain nor would animals, insects and dinosaurs, but who can quibble with such detail? After all, it's in the Bible. I am not anti-religious, I'm just Pro-Logic. There are big problems with a God, evolution, and ignoresbegins with the people that modern man is like almost immediately. We have evidence proving skeleton of Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon, an earlier version of the Homo Sapiens, so enormous cracks in place of the biblical statement. But the cosmic dust solution is also problematic.

It is a matter of statistical probability. The fact that a comet contains exactly the right mix of microbes pass at just the right spot on the Earth sweeps through deposits and the minute in the spotsexact spots with which they thrive and (a) are not killed by the hostile environment, (b) sites in the vicinity of water (so that c) and / or receive the proper amount of sunlight, (d) have something to consume, (e) the occurrence survive in the atmosphere, (f) grow further once they develop on land, and (g) if they are here is an amazing journey. That is, if it so happened. A foreign substance on the human or animal body is immediately attacked in many ways. It is the same in nature. Because to survivethe elements would be really a miracle. So what's the alternative?

Could life spontaneously from the gaseous and chemical components of a young Earth 3500000000 years old produce? If a spark of lightening striking a moving cluster of methane, hydrogen and carbon, a process that would start eventually lead to an elephant or whale? What is likely? Could a series of chemical reactions that are random and independent, finally, a life form? Scientists have triedreplicate life in a laboratory, ala Frankenstein, for centuries, but without success. Today, with all their modern equipment, environmentally controlled labs, chemical and biological knowledge and data-based forecasts, it is not even the most basic structure of life. Obviously, the construction of life is still beyond us. We can not even resurrect a dead life form with all the skills are present. Once the power of life left the body, it seems irreversible.

This bringsus back full circle. Where and how does life begin? I can imagine that if you have read this far, you expect a revelation at this point. I am only a mortal like you. I look at our world and its wonders. I wrote about reincarnation in my novel. "Pursuit of the Phoenix", and many online articles on various aspects of science, including the birth of our universe. But the search for life itself is a confusing and controversial puzzle.

My best guess is thateither (a) a three-dimensional rift allowed life seep out of an existing life-filled parallel world at the time that the Earth cooled enough to form to water vapor, (b) deposited with a very advanced space travelers spores among millions of planets, including ours as part of what it was designed to do, (c) there is a greater intelligence, the earth was ruled ready for life and caused cells to form simple, if he or she thought the time is right.

Make your choice. If you believe in the second response,They are obviously in good company. You must also believe that the same is greater than did the same for millions of other planets. And so we will meet others eventually developed to live in distant worlds for different reasons. And contrary to conventional wisdom, we were not created in God's image. Instead, we have evolved and adapted to the planet need on the basis of the nature to survive. Whatever the outcome, which we here and we have the way is probably irrelevant. And my guess is that wewill never be able to replicate life as we know it and there is a good reason. We are not God and should not try to be there. Leave that to the experts.

Recommend : telescope